” 10 Thus, the author’s argument that there was a connection between the two cases remains unconvincing. The fifth, sixth and seventh chapters, which constitute the longest part of the book as well as its main subject, are devoted to the relocation of Armenians. Akçam’s main argument is that the policies adopted against the Armenians were aimed at their annihilation and that the documentary evidence from the Ottoman archives confirms this.
However, these contentions are not adequately supported. In his introduction to the fifth chapter, Akçam gives special attention to Talat Pasha’s memorandum of May 26, 1915, which outlined the stated reasons for the Armenian relocation and was submitted to Grand Vizier Said Halim Pasha. Akçam argues that the document had never been rendered in mode Turkish in its entirety (p.
However, this is not true the entire text of the document in mode Turkish is actually found in a document collection on the issue. 11 Akçam notes that the Ottoman authorities’ main goal was to remove the possibility of the establishment of an independent Armenian state within the boundaries of the empire. Few would dispute this assertion.
In order to support it, Akçam approvingly quotes from Talat Pasha’s telegram of August 29, 1915, sent to various provinces and sanjaks (pp. Yet, when discussing a different matter some 130 pages later, he changes his mind about the reliability of this document and dismisses the very same telegram as part of “a great deception” (pp. Akçam makes no effort to address the question of why a document likewise you’re in search of course vitae or study traditional document publishing support mhrwriter writing service review both equally you’re searching for program vitae or look into old fashioned newspaper creating assistance that he approvingly quoted in one instance should be dismissed as unreliable in another.
Akçam argues that the relocation of the Armenians went beyond being a temporary security measure and was aimed at “terminally solving the Easte Question” through the extermination of the Armenians. He argues this can be deduced from a letter by the influential CUP member Bahaettin Şakir Bey, quoted by the Turkish joualist Ahmet Emin Yalman (p. Stretching the point further, Akçam observes important “similarities” between this alleged “letter” and two letters attributed to Bahaettin Şakir by Aram Andonian (p.
However, Yalman was not quoting “from a letter of Bahaettin Şakir,” as Akçam contends, but was conveying a rumor. 15 According to Akçam, the CUP’s Central Committee arrived at the decision to annihilate the Armenian population in March 1915 (pp. However, the memoirs of Arif Cemil Denker (to be discussed later), which Akçam uses as his source, do not support such an assertion, but only mention that the “relocation” of Armenians was decided without implying any destructive designs.
Akçam further maintains that some officials who opposed the govement’s policy in this regard were removed from office. He notes, for instance, that Reşit Pasha, the goveor of Kastamonu province, was removed because he opposed the deportations within his province (p. However, it is noteworthy that, even after the removal of Goveor Reşit Pasha, the Interior Ministry in several communiqués dispatched to the province still instructed the local authorities to not deport the Armenians in Kastamonu. At present, the Armenians there will not be relocated. ” 17 Akçam argues that the goveors who were removed from office later testified before the “Commission on the Investigation of Evil Acts,” as well as the post-war military tribunals, that they were removed because of their opposition to the deportations.